Writing within the confines of a daily prompt is an exercise in relinquishing control. While we often believe we are the architects of our own narratives, Priyanka Bhandarkar’s Ink Play illustrates that creativity frequently flourishes when the artist allows the boundaries to lead. This thirty-day challenge compels the author to face the void of the blank page time and again, utilizing repetition as the primary tool to explore her deepest desires.

Ink Play opens with the universe falling in love with itself — the sun captivated by a cloud, their union producing a rainbow that, when asked what it is, answers with a single word: Art. From this lofty genesis, the book transitions into the dense, often suffocating reality of the human creative process, and closes with a woman rediscovering her own voice after nearly surrendering it entirely.

Within this overarching framework, she navigates the labyrinth of the self through thirty discrete pieces and constructs a single sustained argument about what it costs to make something — and what making something costs you. The recurring protagonist, Clara, appears across the collection in wildly different incarnations: a narcissist consumed by a beloved lake, a woman with schizophrenia finding blessings in fireflies; a child who found solace beneath an oak tree and learned that poets are made, not born. If observing a protagonist repeatedly arrive in different bodies, different centuries of herself, asking at varying decibels who she is when she is not the person she intended to become sounds exhausting, it occasionally is. It is also, at its best, genuinely gripping.

Reading these stories is much like observing a sculptor working with clay; while the pursuit of a perfect form is unyielding, the true aesthetic value is often found in the raw fragments left behind during the attempt.

While the thirty-day timeframe provides a strict structure, the narratives themselves are remarkably expansive. Rather than simple diary entries, we are introduced to bakeries where the aging process halts, scientists condemned to permanent invisibility, and cursed lakes that swallow narcissists whole. It would be a fatal error to dismiss these elements as mere whimsy or standard magical realism. By projecting her very real anxieties about isolation, failure, and creative burnout onto time-traveling clocks and sentient flora, Bhandarkar employs folklore as a Trojan horse. She effectively masks the heavy, existential cost of making art within the charm of a fable.

Certain images from these exercises linger long after the pages are turned. A girl waiting for fireflies at dusk creates a deeply resonant visual, while a story set at IIT Mumbai focuses on a friend’s lyrical letter about a shadow that danced while the girl was confined to tutorials. The conclusion of this narrative provides a revelation so raw and unexpected that it compels a complete re-evaluation of the preceding text.

Though the work is imperfect, its flaws stem from a commendable sense of ambition rather than a lack of effort. Narrative stumbles often occur when Bhandarkar’s imaginative reach exceeds her technical grasp—a trade-off that remains preferable to uninspired, safe writing. She effectively captures the crushing pressure of creating for an algorithmic era, particularly in “The Train To Nowhere Had My Name On The Ticket,” which demonstrates how seeking external validation on social media platforms can alienate an artist from their true craft.

There is a fundamental absurdity in the daily commitment to write, especially when the results inevitably fall short of one’s internal ideals. Despite initial skepticism regarding the format of a thirty-day challenge, several of these stories have become permanently etched in my memory. Ultimately, the author—who nearly lost her creative voice to the demands of performance and doubt—reclaimed it by adhering to a simple, ancient directive instruction: put something true on the page, do it thirty times, and watch what accumulates. In this way, the book serves as evidence of the idea that the true masterpiece is never the final manuscript, but the artist who survives the process of creating it.

About the Author:

About the Reviewer: